I had a recent chance to watch the “Come Follow Up” program on the BYU-TV channel (find it here: https://www.byutv.org/come-follow-up ) and I saw in several episodes a good model of how our second hour discussions could be better conducted. Every week or so, the discussion leader (Ben Lomu - handsome polynesian host) brings a gospel scholar and a one or two “Random AnySaints” in front of a group of “spectators” and they chat about the week’s “Come, Follow Me” study. Although informative to just watch the episode, I urge you to take a step back from what is being discussed and see how this weekly presentation flows and who fills what role in their “class”.
The discussion leader kicks things off with a very short summary of what the reading was about. I am not kidding, I timed a few of these summaries and they lasted less than two minutes. This is a good lead-in to help people recall their home scripture study and be ready to discuss what they learned and what touched them.
Then, there is the introduction of the gospel scholar and other guests. These are the people to whom Ben poses the occasional question. The bulk of the discussion is between the gospel scholar and the guests and maybe an audience member, with the discussion leader listening intently to what the speaker is saying and smiling and nodding in an encouraging way.
The gospel scholar often seems to be making a bit of a presentation, working off preparation for teaching an institute or old-time gospel doctrine class. “Look what it says here and what it means…”
The guest participant usually tells personal experiences that relate to what is being said, almost interrupting the scholar but still getting Ben’s listening smile and encouragement.
As I sit in on second-hour time, I get the impression that the “Come Follow Up” gospel scholar has taken over the stage, dismissed Ben, and is giving their prepared institute topic presentation, just like the gospel doctrine teachers of old. If I am not too obnoxiously repetitive, the brethren in leadership want our second hour time to look more like a “Come Follow Up” episode rather than an institute class. To put it another way, those who lead in the second hour should look and behave more like Ben Lomu and much less like the show’s visiting gospel scholar.
Check out a few episodes and see the way the discussion leader behaves. Ben doesn’t have a chalkboard or give out hand-outs. For all we know, the scholar wrote the show’s summary and Ben just reads it off the prompter. Maybe, like so many of our second-hour friends, Ben might not remember what he read during the week or maybe even didn’t read the assignment at all. Not to say that discussion leaders should ignore the content, but your role is to initiate and forward a gospel discussion from instruction that happens elsewhere.
I have never been in a church gathering of any type that didn’t have a very willing gospel scholar in the group, quite able to take over the time and never give it back. So, in the second hour discussions that you lead, you already have your “Come Follow Up” gospel scholar (you know who they are) who needs no encouragement to fulfill their duties in that role. The discussion leader just needs to help the scholar give others a chance to contribute.
Harder to see during second hour is the “Random AnySaint” that might share their experiences from their own home gospel doctrine instruction during the week. As the discussion leader, you may have to coax one or two (or more) group members into talking about what insights were discovered in their home study. Ask questions that help bring out the “Random AnySaint” and their experience.
Each “Come Follow Up” episode also includes a “studio audience”, often painfully quiet, much like most of your second hour participants. The television episode wouldn’t work without the quiet majority in the room and you, as the second-hour discussion leader, should accept that silent group’s role as almost passive listeners. You won’t see Ben spending much effort in getting the crowd to respond, though, when the occasional audience member raises a hand and comments, he is just as attentive and smiling and nodding appreciatively for their contribution as he is to the scholar and featured guest. Give place and acknowledgement for the irregular contribution without strong-arming to get it.
In any given episode, between Ben, the ever-present gospel scholar, and the guests at the front of the stage, the episode time is taken up with discussion and the entire assembled group gets their promised uplift in their own way.
Watch Ben Lomu a few times and see how he leads these discussions. Your role is to be a discussion leader like he is. Let others in the group be the gospel scholar. Work out any ”gospel doctrine teacher” urges in your own home, where the real instruction needs to happen according to the brethren. In second hour, listen to contributors attentively, smile that “Ben smile”, and nod in acknowledgement. The more we lead the group discussions as Ben Lomu does, the closer we come to honoring the Brethren’s charge to us.